Report a food safety issue.

I am reporting
I want to:
Please fill in incident place

Add more

As seen in:

Did you also consume (in the past 7 days):

Skip

Get alerts for your case

Provide a contact email

Please provide email
No Thanks
Without your contact information it's not possible to follow up on your complaint. Please provide your email. Thank you 🙂

Protect friends & family

Provide a contact phone number

This makes it easier to follow up - especially if there is some urgency e.g. in a public health investigation. THANK YOU 👍
No Thanks

Add video or photo!

We Recommend video or photos of:
  1. The receipt
  2. The product
  3. The packaging
Add Photo/Video
Drop files here
No Thanks

Email or SMS a copy of report

Enter below to get emailed or SMS a copy of your report

Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone

Thanks for your report.

The report was
successfully sent!


Your report is queued - it may take up to 12 hours to process your report.

Report by

The Anatomy of a Food Recall: How Information Flows (And Sometimes Doesn't)

Jul 22, 2025

A case study in food safety communication through the Reser's Fine Foods tuna salad recall.

When contaminated food is recalled, the urgency extends far beyond just removing products from store shelves. The tuna salad in question had sell-through dates of July 16-19, 2025, meaning consumers likely purchased and stored these products in their home refrigerators before the recall was announced. A closer look at how the recent Reser's Fine Foods tuna salad recall unfolded reveals a complex reality - one where timing gaps and communication routes can leave consumers several days behind on critical safety information about food they may have already purchased and could be planning to eat.

The Timeline: A Four-Day Information Journey

The Reser's Fine Foods recall offers an instructive example of how food safety information moves through different channels at different speeds. Here's what happened:

  • Before July 17: Reser's Fine Foods identifies potential Listeria contamination in breadcrumbs used in their tuna salad products and initiates an internal recall.
  • July 17, 2025 (Thursday evening): Albertsons Companies releases some limited communication announcing a voluntary recall of tuna salad products supplied by Reser's Fine Foods. Texas FOX affiliates begin reporting the story at 9:56 PM CDT.
  • July 18, 2025: Regional news outlets across Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Oklahoma pick up the story. 
  • July 21, 2025 (Monday): The FDA officially posts recall notices on their website - four days after initial media coverage began.

What's particularly notable about this recall is how the regulatory pathway was significantly longer, the FDA posting took four days to appear after media coverage began. This represents the official government database that many consumers and food safety professionals rely on for authoritative recall information.

The Consumer Reality: Food Already in Home Refrigerators

The timing gaps become particularly concerning when considering that recalled products were likely already in consumers' refrigerators. With sell-through dates of July 16-19, 2025, and the recall announcement not reaching media until July 17 evening, there was potentially a window where:

  • Consumers purchased tuna salad products on July 16-17 before learning of contamination risks
  • Families may have planned meals around these products for the following days
  • Jewel Osco customers in Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa had no regional media coverage until July 21, creating a four-day window where they could have continued consuming potentially contaminated products
  • The four-day delay until FDA posting meant some consumers could have consumed the products before learning about potential Listeria contamination

This highlights why rapid, comprehensive communication is critical - it's not just about preventing future sales, but reaching people who already have potentially contaminated products at home.

The Missing Digital Paper Trail

The communication challenges extend beyond timing to basic accessibility. Despite issuing the press release that triggered all media coverage, Albertsons never posted the recall notice on their corporate website. Jewel Osco's website also contains no mention of the recall. Similarly, Reser's Fine Foods' website contains no mention of the recall in their news section or anywhere else on their site. As of July 22nd, their latest news post is National Macaroni and Cheese day.

This creates a significant access problem:

  • Media-only distribution: The recall information only reached consumers through news outlets, not through the companies' own websites
  • No permanent record: Once news coverage fades, there's no easy way for consumers to find recall details
  • Search engine gaps: Consumers searching "Albertsons recall," "Jewel Osco recall," or "Reser's recall" on company websites find nothing, or be directed to older recalls, potentially creating further confusion.
  • Customer service dependency: The only way to get official information may be to call customer service lines

For Jewel Osco customers in Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa, this was particularly problematic since their retailer never issued any media announcement at all.

What This Means for Consumers

The combination of a four-day FDA posting delay and complete absence of recall information on company websites creates significant challenges for consumers:

  • Regional Media Blackouts: Jewel Osco customers in Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa experienced a complete information blackout during the critical first four days. With no regional press release and no company website posting, these consumers had no practical way to learn about the recall unless they happened to follow Texas/Louisiana news sources.
  • Corporate Communication Disconnect: Despite being owned by the same parent company (Albertsons Companies), Jewel Osco and Albertsons didn't coordinate their public communications, creating inconsistent information availability across their customer base. As of July 22nd there is still no mention the company recall pages. 

The Broader Pattern

This case illustrates how modern food safety communication operates through multiple networks simultaneously:

  • Industry networks (manufacturer to retailer)
  • Media networks (press releases to news outlets) for public awareness
  • Regulatory networks (company to agency to public database) for official documentation

Each serves different purposes and operates at different speeds. The challenge for consumers is understanding which channels to monitor and when to act on information from each.

Practical Implications

For consumers, this recall timeline suggests several practical considerations:

  • Don't Rely on Company Websites: As this case demonstrates, companies may not post recall information on their own websites, even when they've issued press releases to media.
  • Phone Verification May Be Necessary: With recall information absent from company websites, calling customer service lines may be the only way to get official confirmation.

Looking Forward

The Reser's case offers insight into how complex food safety communication networks actually function in practice.

Don't wait for companies to notify you. This case shows why relying on manufacturer websites, retailer announcements, or hoping to catch local news isn't enough. Iwaspoisoned's outbreak and recall monitoring service tracks food safety issues across all sources, ensuring you get timely alerts about recalls that could affect your household.

Sign up for free food safety alerts at iwaspoisoned.com